NO MORE NEW & SOPHISTICATED NUCLEAR WEAPONS:

SHOULD CONGRESS SUPPORT FUNDING FOR NEW AND IMPROVED NUCLEAR WARHEADS FOR THE UNITED STATES?

Congress is weighing a funding request to design anew and improved nuclear warheads for the U.S. Supporters say a new warheads would be more easily maintained, provide additional assurances of security and reliability and allow for a reduction in the number of warheads that will have to be kept in reserve. Opponents say building a new warhead, even if only a replacement, sends the wrong message to the world and could make all the more difficult the resolution of the nuclear problems with Iran and North Korea.

Tell Congress and the President what you think.

I support new and improved nuclear warheads for the U.S.

I oppose new and improved nuclear warheads for the U.S.

How To Compose Your Message:

Message Recipients:
President George W. Bush
Your U.S. Senators
Your U.S. House Representative
Delivery Method:
Email
Printed Letter

-------------------------------------------

April 02-2007:
I oppose new and improved nuclear warheads for the U.S.

Currently, the US has a very large stockpile of nuclear warheads. Too much for a country that is telling the rest of the world to stop seeking the acquisition of nuclear technology or arms. And currently is pressing Iran and North Korea to comply with the international ban of nuclear warheads.

So how on earth could the congress be contemplating more, or an improved type or types of nuclear warheads to include in its' arsenal. Under the guise that this new type of warhead will be much better at killing fellow humans, and a better and more efficient deterrent.

Go To congress.org