Iran May Have Lots Of Oil-But They Cannot Drink It:
February 12-2007:
http://my.opera.com/BringBaka/
Iran May Have Lots Of Oil-But They Cannot Drink It:
If George W. Bush's administration continues to defer direct talks with Iran, then Iran will be forced to seek others who will talk with them, and possibly provide them what they need. Now that they have some sign that Kim Jung IL of North Korea is willing to make some concessions with the US in current bilateral talks, sends a message that direct diplomacy is what makes sense, and what states should do to create a climate of trust, goodwill, and peace. The Bush administration is accusing Iran of supplying munitions to the insurgents in Iraq. Be that as it may, true or false, should not be a premise for the Bush administration not to contemplate direct diplomatic talks with Iran.
Iran May Have Lots Of Oil-But They Cannot Drink It:
If George W. Bush's administration continues to defer direct talks with Iran, then Iran will be forced to seek others who will talk with them, and possibly provide them what they need. Now that they have some sign that Kim Jung IL of North Korea is willing to make some concessions with the US in current bilateral talks, sends a message that direct diplomacy is what makes sense, and what states should do to create a climate of trust, goodwill, and peace. The Bush administration is accusing Iran of supplying munitions to the insurgents in Iraq. Be that as it may, true or false, should not be a premise for the Bush administration not to contemplate direct diplomatic talks with Iran.
The USA is the world's foremost super power. So why should they feel so threatened by less capable states that feel threatened, crying out for help in fear of this super power?
Must the American people wait until after the elections in 2008, for a the new administration in Washington to take the initiative. Or should they hold their breath in the interim, with the fear that a military strike in Iran could be possible. Because already, the USA has increased it's air craft carrier fleet in the Gulf. Claiming that this was done in an effort to monitor and deter terrorist elements trying to smuggle munitions into Iraq or her neighbors via that waterway.
Must the American people wait until after the elections in 2008, for a the new administration in Washington to take the initiative. Or should they hold their breath in the interim, with the fear that a military strike in Iran could be possible. Because already, the USA has increased it's air craft carrier fleet in the Gulf. Claiming that this was done in an effort to monitor and deter terrorist elements trying to smuggle munitions into Iraq or her neighbors via that waterway.
Meanwhile, the Democrats and Republicans are still not able to come up with any definite resolution that specifically says to the White House, that they are opposed to sending any more troops to Iraq. A resolution that has the teeth to make it quite clear to the president that they mean business. The Australian prime Minister is maliciously claiming the presidential contender Sen. Barak Obama is not suited to be the next president. And this comes at a time when he is having some political uncertainty about his re-election Down Under!
Derryck S. Griffith.
Educator-Advocate & Blogger.
Derryck S. Griffith.
Educator-Advocate & Blogger.
posted by Unknown at 8:03 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home